Thoracic Outlet Syndrome International Collaborative Contact Find a TOS center
Home/Research/Research Hub

Research Hub

Ongoing multicenter studies, the policies that govern them, and the route for members to propose new research or join a study that is already recruiting.

Ongoing multicenter studies

Studies open to participating centers

Public summaries are shown here. Protocols, case report forms and the participation request live in the members’ area; each study has an assigned coordinator who reviews requests to join.

Recruiting centersNeurogenic

PRISM — Prospective Registry of Interventions for Neurogenic TOS

A prospective observational study of conservative and surgical management, with patient-reported outcomes at 3, 6 and 12 months using an agreed core outcome set.

DesignProspective, observational
Target600 patients, 25 centers
CoordinatorResearch Chair
Recruiting centersVenous

THROMBUS — timing of decompression after thrombolysis

A multicenter comparison of early versus delayed first rib resection following catheter-directed thrombolysis for effort thrombosis, with vein patency and symptom burden at one year.

DesignRetrospective, multicenter
Target300 patients, 18 centers
CoordinatorRegistry Chair
In analysisArterial

ARTEMIS — arterial TOS and bony anomaly

An international case series describing presentation, imaging findings, reconstruction technique and limb outcome in arterial TOS associated with cervical rib or first rib anomaly.

DesignRetrospective case series
Enrolled142 patients, 21 centers
StatusClosed to new centers
Recruiting centersRehabilitation

RESTORE — rehabilitation pathways after decompression

Comparison of structured post-operative rehabilitation protocols across centers, examining return to work, return to sport and residual symptom scores.

DesignProspective, observational
Target400 patients, 20 centers
CoordinatorRehabilitation Chair

Propose a study

Bringing a research idea to the collaborative

Any member may submit a research proposal. Proposals are reviewed by the research committee, which either approves them, requests changes, or declines with a written reason. You can follow the status of your proposal inside the members’ area and you receive an email at every step.

  1. Submitted — your proposal enters the review queue and you receive confirmation.
  2. Under review — assigned reviewers read the proposal and record comments.
  3. Changes requested — you revise and resubmit the same proposal; no duplicate record is created.
  4. Approved or declined — approved proposals become project pages, with a protocol, case report forms and an assigned coordinator.
Submit a proposal Members only

Policies

Publication policy

How collaborative studies are written up, who approves the manuscript before submission, how the collaborative is named in the byline, and how preprints and embargoes are handled.

Authorship policy

Criteria for named authorship and for collaborator listing, the contribution thresholds for participating centers, and the order in which centers appear.

Registry access

Who may request registry data, what the request must contain, how requests are reviewed, and the conditions attached to any data release.

Statistical support

Advice before you collect the data

The collaborative offers statistical advice to members planning a study — on design, sample size, outcome selection and analysis plan. Requesting advice early is far more useful than requesting it once recruitment has finished.

Data submission

How centers contribute cases

Members with a confirmed affiliation to a listed center submit one structured record per treated case through the members’ area. Records are pseudonymised: no names, no national or hospital identification numbers, and no exact dates of birth. Each center keeps its own local case code; the key that links that code to a patient never leaves the center.